What's next for Brazil after another painful World...

What's next for Brazil after another painful World Cup exit?2hGabriele MarcottiÁlvarez: 'It hurts deeply because this is a family'3hAdriana GarciaOpposition scouting: Former USMNT boss Bruce Arena breaks down Belgium8hJeff CarlisleA key USMNT World Cup perk: An embedded barber who keeps players' hair looking fresh1dSam BordenEngland end Mexico's World Cup with best win on foreign soil in their history12hJames Olley, +2 MoreWorld Cup VAR review: Quansah's red, Kane's penalty -- did the ref get it right?11hAndy DaviesWorld Cup Daily live: Harry Kane loses voice in hilarious interview, USMNT prepares for Belgium1hESPNGrades for every team eliminated from the World Cup: Forgettable Brazil get a D2hRyan O'HanlonWorld Cup 2026 Power Rankings before round of 16: Who's No.

1?2dJames TylerHaaland brings the thunder, strikes down Brazil as Norway reach World Cup quarters16hGabriele Marcotti and Mark OgdenFrance pass toughest World Cup test yet in beating feisty Paraguay2dGabriele Marcotti, +2 MoreTransfer rumors, news: Arsenal eye Wan-Bissaka as White replacement4hESPNMen's transfer grades: Tottenham get C- for $125m Tonali deal5hSam TigheChampions League 2026-27 kicks off with Imps, Saints and Vikings in action8hLee WingateplayHeartbreak in Rio as Haaland doubles Norway's lead vs. Brazil (1:29)Gab MarcottiJul 6, 2026, 09:54 AM ETCloseGabriele Marcotti is a senior soccer writer for ESPN.

com. Read his archive here and follow him on Twitter: @Marcotti.Follow on XMultiple AuthorsEmailPrintOpen Extended ReactionsEAST RUTHERFORD, New Jersey -- Brazil had to wait 28 years to win their first World Cup.

Sunday's elimination in a 2-1 defeat to Norway means that -- once again -- they'll be waiting 28 years, at least, for their next one.That's a psychological blow for a five-time world champion accustomed to being the gold standard, at least in historical and reputational terms. Because misery loves company, their fellow World Cup blue bloods aren't faring much better.

Four-time winners Germany exited in the round of 32, while Italy, also four-time winners, didn't even qualify.Brazil haven't actually beaten European opposition at the World Cup since the 2002 final and, in that time frame, their highest-profile knockout win was probably Colombia, at a home tournament, in 2014.That was the whole point in biting the bullet and bringing in A foreign coach IN Carlo Ancelotti.

His record in knockout competitions in high-pressure jobs at Real Madrid and AC Milan speaks for itself. He's experienced. He's unflappable.

He's been there, done that and smoked the cigar. And as a further show of support, the Brazilian Football Federation even gave him a spanking new four year CONTRACT (through 2030) after less than a year in charge.That's why, immediately after Sunday's game, Ancelotti was careful to underscore how he wasn't about to abandon the Seleção."

Today we have to deal with the disappointment and, starting tomorrow, we can think about what the future might hold for this national team," Ancelotti said. "We're at the beginning of a cycle, not the end of a cycle."He's not ditching Brazil; the question is whether Brazil will ditch him.

Forget his long-term, pricey contract; there are always ways to get out of it if you lose faith in a coach and that's what you think is best. Especially after a game in which you had 36% possssion of the ball against, with all due respect Norway, not exactly the first nation that comes to mind when you think "possession football."Don't be fooled by the expected goals figure, either -- 2.

61 to 1.05 for Brazil -- artificially inflated by the penalties, one missed by Bruno Guimarães and one converted by Neymar deep into garbage time. Yes, as Ancelotti pointed out, Brazil created some significant chances (Endrick's one-on-one stands out) and Ørjan Nyland made at least three world-class saves.

Yet whether we like it or not, every time you step on the pitch in international football you carry your nation's legacy on your back.To watch Brazil have so little of the ball was jarring.Ancelotti had his own explanation, arguing that Norway played well and kept the ball efficiently.

He was reluctant to send his guys to press high up the pitch because of the threat posed by Norway's star striker Erling Haaland on the break. All true, all very legitimate... for an average nation.

Not Brazil.Brazil aren't a bunch of average Joaos; their history demands a higher standard. It just doesn't feel right if they are the ones worrying about the opposition.

I mean, sure, if you're going to fret about Haaland when you have Gabriel and Marquinhos at the back, fine. But then what's Norway meant to do when they have to counter star winger Vinícius Júnior with defenders Kristoffer Ajer and Torbjørn Heggem?It's not as if Ancelotti has turned them into a bolt-the-door watertight defend-and-counter side, either.

Haaland took his goals exceptionally well (because he is exceptional), but he shouldn't have been allowed to peel off his marker,