Giao diện
TeguNews
Thể thao

What can other teams learn from the Knicks' championship? Why roster may be most anomalous in NBA history

The 2026 Knicks broke a 53-year drought without a once-in-a-lifetime superstar as boasted by so many of their predecessors

CBS Sports4 phút đọc

What can other teams learn from the Knicks' championship? Why roster may be most anomalous in NBA history

What can other teams learn from the Knicks' championship? Why roster may be most anomalous in NBA history The 2026 Knicks broke a 53-year drought without a once-in-a-lifetime superstar as boasted by so many of their predecessors By Sam Quinn Jun 15, 2026 at 1:05 pm ET • 7 min read Add CBS Sports on Google Getty Images Every NBA champion hoists the same trophy. That doesn't mean they're made equal.

We know what most of them look like. This is a dynasty league, and the downside of dynastic runs is the degree to which they blend together. How much of a historical distinction is ever drawn between, say, the 1992 and 1993 Chicago Bulls?

The '90s are more or less boiled down to Michael Jordan and the Jordanaires. The NBA tends to subscribe to the "great men" theory of history. Some alpha takes over the league for a period of time before a successor wrestles the belt away from him.

Even our recent streak of non-repeating champions has followed this formula to an extent. Kawhi Leonard won in 2019 and was briefly hailed as the NBA's best player. LeBron James won it all in 2020 and took his crown back.

Giannis Antetokounmpo climbed the mountaintop in 2021. Stephen Curry got back there in 2022. Nikola Jokić rose in 2023.

There's nothing wrong with champions like this. They're the baseline. We're used to contextualizing teams in that manner, and that's what makes it so special when we get a champion that doesn't fall into that bucket.

Every now and then, the league hands us an anomaly.These champions take on an almost sacred place in NBA lore. The 2014 San Antonio Spurs.

The 2011 Dallas Mavericks. The 2004 Detroit Pistons. They can share surface-level similarities with their dynastic counters.

The Spurs technically were a dynasty and still employed a top-10 all-time player in Tim Duncan. The 2011 Mavericks were built around a single superstar in Dirk Nowitzki. But Duncan was well beyond any illusions of alpha status at that point, and Nowitzki's run is remembered mostly for the generations of alphas he beat.

There was no illusion after his run that he had somehow passed Kobe Bryant or LeBron James in any sort of all-time pecking order, but it's nice to be reminded every now and then that even such titans of the game are vulnerable. The 2004 Pistons are the most visceral example of that phenomenon. Their Finals opponent had perhaps the most accomplished starting lineup in NBA history: Bryant, Shaquille O'Neal, Gary Payton and Karl Malone were all Hall of Famers.

The Pistons were their historic opposite. They had no traditional superstars. Their only All-NBA player was Ben Wallace, a single-digit scorer.

They won with a historic defense. They were greater than the sum of their parts. The Spurs achieved the same effect on the other side of the court, reaching basketball nirvana with the most beautiful ball movement the NBA has ever produced.

The Mavericks were Nowitzki's team, but no championship run has ever been as generous with role player memories. Whether it was Peja Stojakovic's 6-of-6 3-point barrage in the clincher over the Lakers, Jason Terry's clutch shots, Brian Cardinal's out-of-nowhere Finals minutes, or the adventures that Deshawn Stevenson and J.J.

Barea had guarding LeBron, practically everyone on the roster got to have a capital "m" Moment.The champions like this are the ones that give normal fanbases hope. They're the ones that tell us that you don't have to have your era's Michael Jordan to win it all, that if you do everything else right and build the perfect team, a magical run really is possible.

No playoff run has ever been quite as magical as the one that just crowned the 2026 New York Knicks as NBA champions. The Knicks entered the postseason in the midst of a 53-year championship drought. They were pushed to the brink in the first round by their weakest playoff opponent, the Atlanta Hawks.

After their second consecutive one-point loss in Game 3, something clicked. The talent was more or less identical to what it was a year ago, when the Knicks lost the Eastern Conference Finals with home-court advantage to the Pacers, but the approach changed drastically. They didn't lose another Eastern Conference playoff game.

The offense was completely reoriented around Karl-Anthony Towns as a passer. The bench Tom Thibodeau ignored became a central character.They were still dismissed in favor of those more traditional contenders.

The common refrain throughout the Western Conference Finals was that the series between the Spurs and the Oklahoma City Thunder was the true NBA Finals. The Thunder were a budding dynasty looking to break the NBA's streak of non-consecutive champions. The Spurs had Victor Wembanyama, the player we presume will eventually become this era's Jordan.

The Spurs are so historically loaded that the NBA literally changed the rules to make sure the mechanism that built them couldn't be repeated. After San Antonio got Wembanyama, Stephon Castle and Dylan Harper in consecutive lotteries, the leag

Nguồn: CBS Sports

Đọc thêm từ Thể thao