Giao diện
TeguNews
Công nghệ

UK parents warned over posting images of children amid AI sexual abuse fears

Exclusive: National Crime Agency and safety watchdog issue guidance amid rise in explicit material onlineAnalysis | AI prey: why watchdogs are telling parents to protect children from nudification appsThe UK National Crime Agency has recommended parents should not put photos of t

The Guardian Technology4 phút đọc

A still from a video released as part of new guidance from the National Crime Agency and the Internet Watch Foundation. Photograph: IWF/VimeoView image in fullscreenA still from a video released as part of new guidance from the National Crime Agency and the Internet Watch Foundation. Photograph: IWF/VimeoUK parents warned over posting images of children amid AI sexual abuse fearsExclusive: National Crime Agency and safety watchdog issue guidance amid rise in explicit material online AI prey: why watchdogs are telling parents to protect children from nudification apps The UK National Crime Agency has recommended parents should not put photos of their children on public display online as part of landmark guidance to tackle the rise of AI-generated sexual abuse material.

Advice issued by the NCA and the child safety watchdog the Internet Watch Foundation suggests parents and guardians make their social media accounts private or share pictures of their children through a “close friends” group.The NCA and IWF stressed they were not telling parents how to behave online, but said they should be aware of the problem and how to tackle it.The guidance also recommends auditing social media accounts for old pictures that could be used by predators and revisiting photo consent agreements – for instance with schools or sports clubs – that could have been signed a few years ago before breakthroughs in AI made image manipulation possible.

“We encourage parents and carers to take a few simple steps today,” said Tim Wright, a senior manager at the NCA.The guidance sets out a trio of actions: checking privacy settings on social media accounts; reviewing who can see images of their children; and having open discussions about giving permission for people and organisations to publish images of kids online.The NCA said most parents and carers would not be aware that advances in the technology had given criminals publicly available tools to create child sexual abuse material (CSAM) without needing to contact – or “groom” – victims directly.

“The average parent or carer does not post a picture of a child online thinking that it might be scraped to be turned into CSAM,” said Lorna Sinclair, a child sexual abuse education manager at the NCA. “There are lots of parents and carers who do not know that this problem exists.”The amount of AI-generated child sexual abuse material found online rose by 14% last year, according to the IWF, which identified 8,029 AI-made images and videos of realistic CSAM in 2025.

The IWF, which monitors CSAM incidents and runs a reporting hotline, has been contacted by under-18s who have been blackmailed by extortionists after their images were nudified by AI. A confidential service for removing explicit images of under-18s taken without their consent, called Report Remove, has also reported examples of image manipulation involving normal, fully-clothed selfies being converted into extreme pornography via AI.In another case heard by the Childline service, a 15-year-old girl said a stranger had made a “really convincing” fake nude of her that used her face and bedroom, having apparently taken the source material from her Instagram account.

Publication of the guidance also follows cases where UK school websites were targeted by blackmailers who scraped pictures of children, used AI tools to convert them into child sexual abuse material, and then threatened to publish the results. A UK advisory body on tackling online harms, the early warning working group (EWWG), whose members include the NCA and IWF, has recommended schools remove identifiable pictures of pupils’ faces from their websites and social media accounts.View image in fullscreenThe IWF’s Dan Sexton said he would be very cautious about putting pictures of children online because of the lack of protection.

Photograph: Graeme Robertson/The GuardianDan Sexton, the IWF’s chief technology officer, said he was “very uncomfortable” about telling parents not to put pictures of children on public display but felt there was no other option. “I don’t know what else to say to parents,” he said. “I would be very cautious [about putting pictures of children online] because there is no protection.”

The NCA and IWF guidance states: “If you’d like to share photos of your child online, we suggest creating a ‘close friends’ group or limiting visibility so only selected people can see them.”The children’s charity the NSPCC also recommends that under-18s keep their social media accounts on a private setting.View image in fullscreenA still from one of the videos released as part of the guidance.

Photograph: IWF/VimeoVideos released as part of the guidance show fictional scenarios of parents taking photos of their children in everyday circumstances, such as playing sport or standing at the school gates, and being reminded about the risks of sharing photos online. The NCA and IWF say they want to encourage parents and children to say “no” to sharing photos online if they are unco

Đọc thêm từ Công nghệ

Jon Prosser responds to Apple lawsuit by blaming the other guy
Công nghệ

Jon Prosser responds to Apple lawsuit by blaming the other guy

YouTuber Jon Prosser has finally filed a formal response to Apple's lawsuit made against him and another defendant over allegedly stealing iOS secrets. In his response, Prosser denied that he "planned or participated in any conspiracy or coordinated scheme" for the "purpose of in

The Verge