Giao diện
TeguNews
Thể thao

Taylor Swift scores major legal win 3 days after marrying Travis Kelce as judge dismisses copyright case against global icon

Taylor Swift has hit another milestone in her life three days after marrying Travis Kelce.

Sportskeeda4 phút đọc

Taylor Swift scores major legal win 3 days after marrying Travis Kelce as judge dismisses copyright case against global icon

× Taylor Swift has hit another milestone in her life three days after marrying Travis Kelce. Ad On Monday, US District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed with prejudice a plagiarism lawsuit that poet Kimberly Marasco had filed against the multi-platinum pop singer-songwriter and various other parties 14 months ago. Marasco had claimed that Swift copied phrases from her works.

When explaining her decision, Cannon said: “Plaintiff’s poems do not contain protectable expression and that, regardless, Plaintiff has failed to plausibly plead copying.” Looking to predict NFL playoff Scenarios? Try our NFL Playoff Predictor for real-time simulations and stay ahead of the game!

She added that Marasco had conceded to not actively promoting her poetry books, only one of which sold 3,000 copies. In addition, she mentioned that, even in the instances that Swift and her co-songwriters had seen and taken inspiration from Marasco's works (like "The Man" and "The Great War"), it would still be a stretch to assume plagiarism: Ad Trending “Such content amount[s] at most to ideas, metaphors, contexts, and themes — none of which is a proper subject of copyright protection.” Finally, Cannon agreed with the defendants' insistence that the plaintiff had done "shotgun pleading" -- i.

e, bundling multiple claims without specifying who is responsible for what, and which refers to which: “Plaintiff refers to the three Defendants collectively throughout her infringement allegations despite the distinct roles an artist, a record label, and a parent company occupy in the music industry, and several counts bundle multiple songs and multiple poems together.” Ad Variety @VarietyA federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by a Florida poet who claims Taylor Swift copied phrases from her work in more than a dozen songs: • The plaintiff, Kimberly Marasco, published a poetry book that sold 3,000 copies globally • The judge concluded that Marasco's Ad ALSO READ: "Married a meathead": Dave Portnoy opens up about Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift divorce narrative just days after couple's wedding ALSO READ: Chiefs HC Andy Reid reveals kissing advice Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce got from wedding officiator Adam Sandler Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce receive message of gratitude from Nashville-based charity Before they tied the knot, Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce donated $26 million to various charities in America. While most of them were based in New York, where their wedding took place, there was one in Nashville, Tennessee that received a portion of it -- The Store.

Ad Director of Mission Advancement Brittney Brown issued this statement to WKRN News 2, ABC's affiliate in the Nashville area: “It was just such an extraordinary blessing to hear about this gift and just knowing the impact that it is going to make on our mission, on the people that we feed, and the customers. It’s an extraordinary gift. It reminds them that they matter, instills in them dignity, and empowers them to choose and make healthy choices.”

The Store was founded by country musician Brad Paisley and his wife, actress Kimberly Williams in March 2020. It has two locations in Nashville. × Was this article helpful?

Thank You for feedback "Caught more bags than touchdowns": NFL fans react to Garrett Wilson's blockbuster $130,000,000 contract extension Quick Links More from Sportskeeda Edited by Andre Castillo Taylor Swift has hit another milestone in her life three days after marrying Travis Kelce. Ad On Monday, US District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed with prejudice a plagiarism lawsuit that poet Kimberly Marasco had filed against the multi-platinum pop singer-songwriter and various other parties 14 months ago. Marasco had claimed that Swift copied phrases from her works.

When explaining her decision, Cannon said: “Plaintiff’s poems do not contain protectable expression and that, regardless, Plaintiff has failed to plausibly plead copying.” Looking to predict NFL playoff Scenarios? Try our NFL Playoff Predictor for real-time simulations and stay ahead of the game!

She added that Marasco had conceded to not actively promoting her poetry books, only one of which sold 3,000 copies. In addition, she mentioned that, even in the instances that Swift and her co-songwriters had seen and taken inspiration from Marasco's works (like "The Man" and "The Great War"), it would still be a stretch to assume plagiarism: Ad Trending “Such content amount[s] at most to ideas, metaphors, contexts, and themes — none of which is a proper subject of copyright protection.” Finally, Cannon agreed with the defendants' insistence that the plaintiff had done "shotgun pleading" -- i.

e, bundling multiple claims without specifying who is responsible for what, and which refers to which: “Plaintiff refers to the three Defendants collectively throughout her infringement allegations despite the distinct roles an artist, a record label, and a parent company occupy in the music industry, and several counts bundle multiple songs a

Nguồn: Sportskeeda

Đọc thêm từ Thể thao