Karnataka High Court denies visitation rights to father who waived them in divorce deal
The High Court of Karnataka has found fault with an order passed by a Family Court in granting visitation rights to a father who had voluntarily relinquished them while handing over permanent custody of his minor son to the child’s mother during a mutual divorce two years ago.Jus

The High Court of Karnataka has found fault with an order passed by a Family Court in granting visitation rights to a father who had voluntarily relinquished them while handing over permanent custody of his minor son to the child’s mother during a mutual divorce two years ago.Justice P. Sree Sudha set aside the Family Court’s January 2026 order, which, on an application filed by the 34-year-old father under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, had allowed him to visit his five-year-old son and directed him to pay 50% of the child’s educational expenses.
The couple’s marriage was dissolved through a mutual consent divorce decree in September 2024 following a mediation settlement. According to a clause in the settlement agreement, the father explicitly “gave up his visitation rights” and agreed that the 29-year-old mother would be the “permanent custodian and guardian” of their son. Fathers losing out in child visitation battles, says report The mother had argued before the High Court that the father had shown no interest in the child’s upbringing, neither providing financial support nor emotional guidance, and had already remarried.
It was also brought to the High Court’s notice that the petition under the Guardians and Wards Act had been filed before the Family Court by misrepresenting facts.“The father voluntarily and consciously gave up his visitation rights and cannot be permitted to initiate fresh litigation after a year. When he is not ready to take up responsibility for the child financially and emotionally, he cannot interfere in the child’s life by seeking visitation again.
When he avoids duty, he cannot claim rights,” the High Court observed.The High Court also noted that the mother had not sought any payment or maintenance from the father at the time of the dissolution of marriage and had, in turn, withdrawn the criminal case for attempt to murder and harassment lodged against him. Published - July 04, 2026 06:37 pm IST Read Comments Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit READ LATER SEE ALL Remove
Đọc thêm từ Thế giới

이 대통령 “3대 메가프로젝트, 지지율 노렸다면 지방선거 전에 했을 것”
본문정치청와대이 대통령 “3대 메가프로젝트, 지지율 노렸다면 지방선거 전에 했을 것”서보미기자수정 2026-07-04 11:19펼침0:00Your browser does not support theaudio element.구글 선호 매체 등록이재명 대통령과 이재용 삼성전자 회장, 최태원 에스케이(SK)그룹 회장이 지난달 29일 청와대에서 열린 3대 메가프로젝트 국민보고회에서 손을 잡고 있다. 청와대통신사진기자단광고이재명 대통령이 ‘3대 메가프로젝트’와 관련해 “지지율보다 더 중요한 건 성과와 실적

Burnham told to consider means testing state pension to fill defence blackhole
Tax expert Dan Neidle has listed 37 options for Andy Burnham to raise the £4.7bn needed to fill the gap in defence spending

Trump kicks off America’s 250th with dead of night memes trolling foes as Pee-wee Herman and Alfred E. Neuman
Trump caps off apocalyptic Independence Day speech on midterm elections with Truth Social posts aimed at Democrats

BBC sued for £1.2 million over Panorama segment on Evri
Evri suing BBC for £1.2m over Panorama segment after ‘serious financial loss’